Social Networking Sites Have Made It Easier for Everyone to Publicly Express Political Views. Has This Ability Benefited or Challenged Democracy?

societal networking sites stand made it easier for everyone to publicly show policy-making views. Has this cogency benefited or challenged democracy? In the 21st Century, the hot media technologies of for accessible networking had composed a commonplace for people all across the testis to actively bulgeicipate in discussion of governmental issues. To date, affectionate networking sites such(prenominal) as Facebook had come up with at least a trillion rehearsers in 2012 (Vance, 2012). Other popular social networking sites are MySpace, Blogger, YouTube, and Google which people employ astray directlyadays.With increase to the popularity of social networking sites, users involved in policy-making issues had adult rapidly over the eld. These social networking sites put millions of people in unvarying contact with each other and are tools which many people utilise to connect with their families and friends and to let go ofly express their semipolitical thought which shapes public opinions and remedy elective participation. Everyone can be a journalist by dint of these online intercourse technologies. News travel instanteously and are ubiquitous.I believed that talk license is essential for democracy, and the ability to publicly express political views on social networking sites have benefitted democracy. In this essay, I will discuss the term of democracy, state the cistrons such as emancipation of speech and encourage elective participation in preteen people and gives examples on democratic practices through online technologies uses. Firstly, to talk about democracy, it is say to be a government that gives the citizens the right to choose who to govern them, and have a say to decide on what will affects their future.There should be free and fair elections and to protect human rights. Democracy requires responsibility and participation of people. I personalizedly think that two key factors of democracy are comparability and freedom of speech. neighborly networking sites is a useful medium for political discussion, education, count and participation which allow greater freedom of expression, facilitating the citizens to challenge and criticise on political issues, which is a basic democratic right. People would now satisfactory to comment on any political issues, or even create political mathematical groups forums and campaigns through these social networking sites.The internet can support the presidential term of topic oriented pressure groups, protests organisations, and ideological movements (Neumayer, Christina and Celina, 2008). All these improve democratic participation. To promote democracy through social network uses, government becomes honest and accountable, which works in the peoples favour, and eventually gains trust and authorize the citizens. In (Scott, 2010), it is stated that, People passionately fight and die for their freedom, and even to gain freedom for others.People want to have and express their individual and joint identities, which may be an even more(prenominal) than important concept than freedom itself. They want free from oppression, want justice, and want to go after in collective activity that promotes everyones wellbeing. Some of these needs have been recognized and formulated into political systems from as early as 5000 years ago in antediluvian Sumer. Democracy has proven best for obtaining those goals of identity, individual freedom, and collective wellbeing. Another factor is that enabling freely expressing political views on social networks had increased the offspring of young people actively involving in political issues. Nowadays, the world of communication technologies is the only world young children and youth knows, it is a routine for them to use internet as educational tool, in and out of school (White, pluck and Wyn, 2008). Political issues are seldom discuss or taught in school. Social network hence engages young people, increas e youth voter yield and raise awareness of political issues amongst the youth.Media technologies are an extremely important part of informal learning environment. (Greenfield, 2009). This is also another factor which contributes to improving democratic participation. From the findings of Pew Internet and American Life Project, 2012 Younger users are more likely to post their own thoughts about issues, post links to political material, encourage others to take political action, belong to a political group on a social networking site, follow elected officials on social media, and like or promote political material others have posted. Lastly, there are a few examples of democratic practices through social networking sites utilise by political representatives happening in our world. One of them is the United States President, Barack Obama who make online campaign using social media and technology, as a part of its booming strategy for the presidential election in 2007, to raise mon ey, and more importantly, organize a groundswell of empowered volunteers who felt that they could make a difference (Aaker and Chang, 2009). ground on the todays method of teaching, digital immigrant whom need to suit to the current needs to always be retaining their foot in the past.Likewise for the 2012 presidential election, President Obama makes use of the social media, such as Twitter, Facebook and YouTube and eventually won the election the second time. The second example, is the Singapore Prime Minister, Lee Hsien Loong who had conjugate Facebook and Twitter in 2012 as an increased effort to engage with young Singaporeans. He has also asked the people to suggest, share and voice out ideas and thoughts of how to castrate and reform the country and improving lives. The social networking sites had proven to contribute political success across the globe.In conclusion, the use of social networking provides convenient access for everyone to be better informed about current st ate affairs. It is being widely used in many parts of the world, not only for personal communication, but also to address publicly political, critical or forbidden issues, which are not always accessible through traditional media. Social networks had also raised awareness of current political affairs among youngsters, which results has shown that more young people are participating in political issues than years ago when politics has not officially stepped in the media frenzy.Furthermore, even political leaders had actively joined the social media to be able to engage more with the youngsters and modern digital natives. More democratic practices are performed through social media uses. With the ever growing numbers of social network users now able to access, create and distribute information, ideas are spreading faster, pushing the boundaries of freedom of expression and opening up new possibilities for change, reform and better forest of lives. The social network created a avenue for discussion about political issues and has become a potential catalyst for democratisation.References Ashlee Vance. 2012. Facebook The Making of 1 one million million users. Bloomberg Business week http//www. businessweek. com/articles/2012-10-04/facebook-the-making-of-1-billion-users Dorian Scott Cole. 2010. Philosophy of Democracy Visual author http//www. visualwriter. com/WhatKindWorld/philosophy_of_democracy. htm Greenfield, Patricia M. 2009. Technology and Informal Education What Is Taught, What Is Learned. Science 323 69-71. Jennifer Aaker and Victoria Chang. 2009. Obama and the power of social media and technology The